Reconsiderando três aspectos da técnica psicanalítica

Autores/as

  • Thomas H. Ogden American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Palabras clave:

Técnica analítica, Psicanálise, Transferência

Resumen

Neste trabalho, três aspectos da técnica analítica são reconsiderados a partir da perspectiva de que a técnica analítica deve servir ao processo analítico. O autor vê o processo analítico envolvendo centralmente o interjogo inconsciente de estados de devaneio do analista e analisando, levando à criação de um terceiro sujeito na análise. é através da experiência compartilhada do terceiro analítico que analista e analisando adquirem um sentido de e geram símbolos para os aspectos anteriormente não verbalizados e não pensados do mundo objetal interno do analisando. O estado de devaneio do par analítico requer condições de privacidade que devem ser garantidas pela técnica analítica. Na perspectiva da atual concepção de processo analítico, o autor tenta, na primeira parte deste trabalho, reconsiderar o papel do divã no processo analítico. A segunda e terceira partes são dedicadas ao reexame de aspectos da técnica analítica relacionados à “regra fundamental” da Psicanálise e à análise dos
sonhos (AU)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Thomas H. Ogden, American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Membro Efetivo da American Psychoanalytic Association.

Citas

ALTMAN, L. (1975). The Dream in Ppsychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

______. (1976). Discussion of Epstein. J. Philadelphia Assn. Psychoanal., 3:5859.

BARANGER, M. (1993). The mind of the analyst: from listening to interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 1524.

BRON, W.R. (1962). Learning from Experience. New York: Basic Books.

______. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. In: Melanie Klein Today. vol.2., Mainly Practice, ed. E. Spillius. London: Routledge,

p. 1721.

BLECHNER, M. (1995). The patient’s dreams and the countertransference. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 5: 126.

BONIME, W. (1962). The Clinical Use of Dreams. New York: Basic Books.

BOYER, L. B. (1988). Thinking of the interview as if it were a dream.Contemp. Psychoanal., 24: 275281.

COLTART, N. (1991). The silent patient. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 439454.

DUNCAN, R. (1960). Often I am permitted to return to a meadow. In: Robert Duncan: Selected Poems, ed. R. bertholf. New York:

New Directions, 1993, p.44.

EPSTEIN, G. (1976). A note on a semantic confusion in the fundamental rule of psychoanalysis. J. Philadelphia Assn.

Psychoanal., 3: 5457.

ETCHEGOYEN, H. (1991). The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnac.

FENICHEL, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Tecnique. New York: Psychoanalytic Quartely Inc.

FRANK, A. (1995). The couch, the psychoanalytic process, and psychic change: a case study. In: Psychoanal. Inq., 15: 324337.

FRENCH, T.; FROM, E. (1964). Dream Interpretation: A New Approach. Madison: Int. Univ. Press.

FREUD, S. (1897). Extracts from Fliess papers, Draft M, May 2, 1897. S.E.1.

______. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S.E. 45.

______. (191115).

Papers on Technique. S.E. 12.

______. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis.

S.E. 12.

______. (1913). On beginning the treatment. S.E. 12.

______. (1914). On the history of the psychoanalytic

movement. S.E. 14.

______. (1915). The unconscious. S.E. 14.

______. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. S.E. 8.

______. (1923a). Two encyclopedia articles. S.E. 18.

______. (1923b). Remarks on the theory and practice of dreaminterpretation.

S.E. 19

GARMA, A.(1966). The Psychoanalysis of Dreams.Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

GOLDBERGER, M.(1995). The couch as defense and as potential for enactment. Psychoanal. Q., 63: 2342.

GRAY, P. (1992). Memory as resistance, and the telling of a dream.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40: 307326.

______. (1994). The Ego and the Analysis of Defense. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

GREEN, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolisation and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic

experience).Int. J. Psychoanal., 56: 122.

GREENSON, R.(1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, v.1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

______. (1971). Panel. The basic rule: free association – a reconsideration. H. Seidenberger, reporter. J. Amer.Psychoanal.

Asson., 19: 98109.

GROTSTEIN, J. (1979). Who is the dreamer who dreams the dream and who is the dreamer who understands it? Contemp.

Psychoanal., 15: 110169.

______. (1995). A reassessment of the couch in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Inq.,15: 396405.

ISAKOWER, O. (1938). A contribution to the psychopathology of phenomena related to falling asleep. Int. J. Psychoanal., 19: 331335.

______. (1963). Minutes of faculty meeting. New York: Psychoanalytic Institute.

JACOBSON, J. (1995). The analytic couch: facilitator or sine qua non? Psychoanal. Inq., 15: 304313.

JOSEPH, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66: 447454.

LEWIN, B. (1950). The Psychoanalysis of Elation. New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly Inc.

LICHTENBERG, J. (1995). Fortyfive

years of psychoanalytic experiences on, bebind, and without the couch. Psychoanal. Inq.,

: 280293.

LICHTENBERG, J.; GALLER, F. (1987). The fundamental rule: study of current usage. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 4776.

OGDEN, T. (1986). The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1988). On the dialectical structure of experience: some clinical and theoretical implications. Contem. Psychoanal., 24:

______. (1989a). On the concept of an autisticcontiguous

position. Int. J. Psychoanal., 70: 127140.

______. (1989b). The Primitive Edge of Experience. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1991). Some theoretical comments on personal isolation. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 377390.

______. (1992a). The dialectically constituted/decentred subject of psychoanalysis. I. The Freudian Subject. Int. J. Psychoanal.,

: 517526.

______. (1992b). The dialectically constituted/descentred subject of psychoanalysis. II. The Contributions of Klein and Winnicott.

Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 613626.

______. (1994a). The analytic thirdworking

with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 320.

______. (1994b). The concept of interpretative action. Psychoanal.Q., 63: 219245.

______. (1994c). Identificação projetiva e o terceiro subjugador. Revista de Psicanálise da Sociedade Psicanalítica de Porto

Alegre, 2: 153162.

(Published in English as ‘Projective identification and the subjugating third’. In: Subjects of Analysis,

Northvale: Jason Aronson, 1994, p.97106).

______. (1994d). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1995). Analysing forms of aliventess and deadness of the transferencecountertransference.

Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 695710.

______. (1996). The perverse subject of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., In press.

RANGELL, L. (1987). Historical perspectives and current status of the interpretation of dreams in clinical work.In: The

Interpretation of Dreams in Clinical Work, ed. A. Rothstein. Madison: Int. Univ. Press, p. 324.

SANDLER, J. (1976). Dreams, unconscious fantasias and ‘identity of perception’. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3: 3342.

SEGAL, H. (1991). Dream, Phantasy and Art. London: Tavistoch.

SHARPE, E. (1937). Dream Analysis. London: Hogarth, 1949.

WHITMAN, R. et.al. (1969). Dreams about the patient. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7: 702727.

WINNICOTT, D.W. (1947). Hate in the countertransference. In: Through Paediatrics to PsychoAnalysis.

New York: Basic Books,

p. 194203.

______. (1963). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In: The Maturational Processes

and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, p.179192.

______. (1971a). Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.

______. (1971b). The place where we live. In: Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, p. 104111.

______. (1971c). Playing: a theoretical statement. In: Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, p. 3852.

ZWEIBEL, R.(1985). The countertransference dream. Int. J. Psychoanal., 12: 8799.

Publicado

1996-12-07

Cómo citar

Ogden, T. H. (1996). Reconsiderando três aspectos da técnica psicanalítica. Revista De Psicoanálisis De La SPPA, 3(3), 421–444. Recuperado a partir de https://sppa.emnuvens.com.br/RPdaSPPA/article/view/838

Número

Sección

Artigos