Reconsiderando três aspectos da técnica psicanalítica

Autores

  • Thomas H. Ogden American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Palavras-chave:

Técnica analítica, Psicanálise, Transferência

Resumo

Neste trabalho, três aspectos da técnica analítica são reconsiderados a partir da perspectiva de que a técnica analítica deve servir ao processo analítico. O autor vê o processo analítico envolvendo centralmente o interjogo inconsciente de estados de devaneio do analista e analisando, levando à criação de um terceiro sujeito na análise. é através da experiência compartilhada do terceiro analítico que analista e analisando adquirem um sentido de e geram símbolos para os aspectos anteriormente não verbalizados e não pensados do mundo objetal interno do analisando. O estado de devaneio do par analítico requer condições de privacidade que devem ser garantidas pela técnica analítica. Na perspectiva da atual concepção de processo analítico, o autor tenta, na primeira parte deste trabalho, reconsiderar o papel do divã no processo analítico. A segunda e terceira partes são dedicadas ao reexame de aspectos da técnica analítica relacionados à “regra fundamental” da Psicanálise e à análise dos
sonhos (AU)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Thomas H. Ogden, American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Membro Efetivo da American Psychoanalytic Association.

Referências

ALTMAN, L. (1975). The Dream in Ppsychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

______. (1976). Discussion of Epstein. J. Philadelphia Assn. Psychoanal., 3:5859.

BARANGER, M. (1993). The mind of the analyst: from listening to interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 74: 1524.

BRON, W.R. (1962). Learning from Experience. New York: Basic Books.

______. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. In: Melanie Klein Today. vol.2., Mainly Practice, ed. E. Spillius. London: Routledge,

p. 1721.

BLECHNER, M. (1995). The patient’s dreams and the countertransference. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 5: 126.

BONIME, W. (1962). The Clinical Use of Dreams. New York: Basic Books.

BOYER, L. B. (1988). Thinking of the interview as if it were a dream.Contemp. Psychoanal., 24: 275281.

COLTART, N. (1991). The silent patient. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 439454.

DUNCAN, R. (1960). Often I am permitted to return to a meadow. In: Robert Duncan: Selected Poems, ed. R. bertholf. New York:

New Directions, 1993, p.44.

EPSTEIN, G. (1976). A note on a semantic confusion in the fundamental rule of psychoanalysis. J. Philadelphia Assn.

Psychoanal., 3: 5457.

ETCHEGOYEN, H. (1991). The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnac.

FENICHEL, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Tecnique. New York: Psychoanalytic Quartely Inc.

FRANK, A. (1995). The couch, the psychoanalytic process, and psychic change: a case study. In: Psychoanal. Inq., 15: 324337.

FRENCH, T.; FROM, E. (1964). Dream Interpretation: A New Approach. Madison: Int. Univ. Press.

FREUD, S. (1897). Extracts from Fliess papers, Draft M, May 2, 1897. S.E.1.

______. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S.E. 45.

______. (191115).

Papers on Technique. S.E. 12.

______. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis.

S.E. 12.

______. (1913). On beginning the treatment. S.E. 12.

______. (1914). On the history of the psychoanalytic

movement. S.E. 14.

______. (1915). The unconscious. S.E. 14.

______. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. S.E. 8.

______. (1923a). Two encyclopedia articles. S.E. 18.

______. (1923b). Remarks on the theory and practice of dreaminterpretation.

S.E. 19

GARMA, A.(1966). The Psychoanalysis of Dreams.Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

GOLDBERGER, M.(1995). The couch as defense and as potential for enactment. Psychoanal. Q., 63: 2342.

GRAY, P. (1992). Memory as resistance, and the telling of a dream.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40: 307326.

______. (1994). The Ego and the Analysis of Defense. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

GREEN, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolisation and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic

experience).Int. J. Psychoanal., 56: 122.

GREENSON, R.(1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis, v.1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.

______. (1971). Panel. The basic rule: free association – a reconsideration. H. Seidenberger, reporter. J. Amer.Psychoanal.

Asson., 19: 98109.

GROTSTEIN, J. (1979). Who is the dreamer who dreams the dream and who is the dreamer who understands it? Contemp.

Psychoanal., 15: 110169.

______. (1995). A reassessment of the couch in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Inq.,15: 396405.

ISAKOWER, O. (1938). A contribution to the psychopathology of phenomena related to falling asleep. Int. J. Psychoanal., 19: 331335.

______. (1963). Minutes of faculty meeting. New York: Psychoanalytic Institute.

JACOBSON, J. (1995). The analytic couch: facilitator or sine qua non? Psychoanal. Inq., 15: 304313.

JOSEPH, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66: 447454.

LEWIN, B. (1950). The Psychoanalysis of Elation. New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly Inc.

LICHTENBERG, J. (1995). Fortyfive

years of psychoanalytic experiences on, bebind, and without the couch. Psychoanal. Inq.,

: 280293.

LICHTENBERG, J.; GALLER, F. (1987). The fundamental rule: study of current usage. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 4776.

OGDEN, T. (1986). The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1988). On the dialectical structure of experience: some clinical and theoretical implications. Contem. Psychoanal., 24:

______. (1989a). On the concept of an autisticcontiguous

position. Int. J. Psychoanal., 70: 127140.

______. (1989b). The Primitive Edge of Experience. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1991). Some theoretical comments on personal isolation. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 377390.

______. (1992a). The dialectically constituted/decentred subject of psychoanalysis. I. The Freudian Subject. Int. J. Psychoanal.,

: 517526.

______. (1992b). The dialectically constituted/descentred subject of psychoanalysis. II. The Contributions of Klein and Winnicott.

Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 613626.

______. (1994a). The analytic thirdworking

with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 320.

______. (1994b). The concept of interpretative action. Psychoanal.Q., 63: 219245.

______. (1994c). Identificação projetiva e o terceiro subjugador. Revista de Psicanálise da Sociedade Psicanalítica de Porto

Alegre, 2: 153162.

(Published in English as ‘Projective identification and the subjugating third’. In: Subjects of Analysis,

Northvale: Jason Aronson, 1994, p.97106).

______. (1994d). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

______. (1995). Analysing forms of aliventess and deadness of the transferencecountertransference.

Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 695710.

______. (1996). The perverse subject of analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., In press.

RANGELL, L. (1987). Historical perspectives and current status of the interpretation of dreams in clinical work.In: The

Interpretation of Dreams in Clinical Work, ed. A. Rothstein. Madison: Int. Univ. Press, p. 324.

SANDLER, J. (1976). Dreams, unconscious fantasias and ‘identity of perception’. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3: 3342.

SEGAL, H. (1991). Dream, Phantasy and Art. London: Tavistoch.

SHARPE, E. (1937). Dream Analysis. London: Hogarth, 1949.

WHITMAN, R. et.al. (1969). Dreams about the patient. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7: 702727.

WINNICOTT, D.W. (1947). Hate in the countertransference. In: Through Paediatrics to PsychoAnalysis.

New York: Basic Books,

p. 194203.

______. (1963). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In: The Maturational Processes

and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, p.179192.

______. (1971a). Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.

______. (1971b). The place where we live. In: Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, p. 104111.

______. (1971c). Playing: a theoretical statement. In: Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, p. 3852.

ZWEIBEL, R.(1985). The countertransference dream. Int. J. Psychoanal., 12: 8799.

Publicado

07-12-1996

Como Citar

Ogden, T. H. (1996). Reconsiderando três aspectos da técnica psicanalítica. Revista De Psicanálise Da SPPA, 3(3), 421–444. Recuperado de https://sppa.emnuvens.com.br/RPdaSPPA/article/view/838

Edição

Seção

Artigos